The SEC usually requires foreign registrants to furnish economic facts substantially comparable to that required of domestic providers. The SEC’s monetary reporting needs are acknowledged to be by far the most comprehensive and rigorously enforced of any inside the globe. Whether the SEC’s needs support or hinder the SEC in meeting its regulatory objectives is widely debated. The SEC’s reporting specifications are commonly constant using the objectives of investor protection and industry good quality. On the other hand, stringent reporting specifications could obtain the aim of investor protection at the expense of decreasing investment opportunities or imposing high transaction expenses on investing. Some commentators argue that the SEC’s monetary reporting needs for foreign organizations deter them from generating their securities offered within the United States.

Underlying this argument are the principles of full disclosure and equal remedy of foreign and domestic issuers. Indeed, the competitive strength of U.S. capital markets, which includes their substantial liquidity and high level of investor confidence, is often attributed (at the least in portion) to the SEC’s existing disclosure program and vigorous enforcement. Investigation shows that cross-listing in U.S. markets can significantly lessen a foreign firm’s expense of capital, especially if the firm is from a country with weak shareholder protection.The implementation with the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) has been accompanied by new complaints about its Section 404 requiring the chief executives and chief economic officers of public businesses (and their external auditors) to appraise and certify the effectiveness and adequacy of internal controls. Some foreign firms have delisted from U.S. stock exchanges (such as British organizations Cable and Wireless and Rank Group). Other people are apparently avoiding U.S. listings and choosing to list on other markets for example the London Stock Exchange. This problem raises issues similar to those about the SEC’s reporting requirements. Sarbanes-Oxley has imposed substantial new audit expenses on providers (estimates range from 35 to 150 percent of pre-SOX audit charges). But the benefits of improved auditing and additional trustworthy financial statements are no less actual.
No comments:
Post a Comment